Key findings

• The titling of Comunidades Nativas (Native Communities) alone is not enough to ensure Indigenous Peoples’ access to sustainable livelihoods in the Peruvian Amazon.
• Lack of income options, combined with restrictive legal frameworks for resource use under the Comunidad model, led to unsustainable land and resource use.
• In seeking to access cash incomes, Comunidades often entered into exploitative relationships with smallholder migrant farmers and timber companies.
• Regulations for resource use and the Comunidad’s governance framework do not reflect local livelihoods and leadership practices; interviewees highlighted that this created challenges related to livelihoods, conflicts, participation and representation in communal governance.
• A transition from a punitive to an enabling role for government agencies – including investing to develop both the institutional and technical capacities of Comunidades – is essential to support more sustainable livelihoods.

Authors: Guerra, M.; Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.; Begert, B.

Subjects: indigenous people, livelihoods, natural resource management, small scale farming, governance, local government, sustainability

Publication type: Brief, Publication

Year: 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/008349