This document summarizes a study on the bushmeat trade in the Amazonian trifrontier region of Colombia, Peru, and Brazil. The study found:
1) A total of 195 people participated in the bushmeat market chain as hunters, market sellers, or restaurant owners.
2) Hunters reported catching over 13 tons of bushmeat in 60 days, consisting mainly of mammals. Market sellers reported over 6 tons of bushmeat sales in 20 days.
3) The bushmeat trade contributes significantly to local livelihoods and economies, with an estimated annual value of $686,000.
CCXG global forum, April 2024, Brian Motherway and Paolo Frankl
Participatory Monitoring Reveals Significant Urban Bushmeat Trade in the Amazon
1. Innovative ways for conserving the ecosystem services provided by bushmeat
SYMPOSIA
ATBC 2014
Cairns, Australia
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING OF THE BUSHMEAT TRADE IN THE
AMAZONIAN TRIFRONTIER (COLOMBIA, PERU & BRAZIL)
Daniel Cruz-Antia, María Paula Quiceno, Nathalie van Vliet, Lindon Jonhson Neves & Robert Nasi
2. Bushmeat is still fundamental for the subsistence of rural and
urban communities in the Amazon, even in contexts of rapid
socioeconomic transformations push rural livelihoods away
from the dependency on forest products.
Rural hunting: 150 000 tons/year (Nasi, Taber & van Vliet, 2011)
Lack of information for urban bushmeat marketsilegallity
Insignificant: Because of availability and prices of domestic
sources of protein (Rushton et al, 2005)
• Iquitos, Loreto - Peru (Bodmer and Lozano 2001, Claggett 1998)
• Abaetetuba, Pará-Brazil (Baía et al 2010)
Bushmeat and the rural to urban transition
3. Research questions
Study case in a frontier region
Why is data on urban bushmeat trade so scarce in the
Amazon?
• Is the trade insignificant?
• Is it invisible and difficult to assess because it occurs in
hidden markets?
• Is it because public institutions and research have
provided little efforts in quantifying its importance?
Describe the structure and function of the bushmeat market
chain
5. Methods
Diversity of approaches to describe and quantify the
bushmeat market chain:
Participatory observation
Informal and semi-estructured interviews
Participatory monitoring
7. 113
23
8 22 11 10
26
HUNTERS MARKET SELLERS RESTAURANTS
(FORMAL)
RESTAURANTS
(INFORMAL)
Numberofusers
Men Women
Stakeholders in the bushmeat market chain
195 users (115 hunters, 34 market sellers, 18 formal
restaurants and 28 informal restaurants)
8. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Santa Rosa (Pe)
Caballococha & Atacuari River (Pe)
Islandia (Pe)
Puerto Nariño & Loretoyacu river (Col)
Leticia (Col)
Atalaia do Norte (Bra)
Benjamin Constant (Bra)
Tabatinga (Bra)
Number of users
Restaurants (Informal) Restaurants (Formal) Market sellers Hunters
Stakeholders in the bushmeat market chain
10. Catchment area and trade routes
Flows are limited by control operations and costs of
transportation and supplies, and vary according to the
availability of fish and the demand from coca workers
11. Species composition and quantities of bushmeat
Hunters (8)
• Mammals
60%, birds
26%, reptiles
14%.
• 485 individuals
and 13 tons in
60 days
• 5,24 tons
Low level
• 7,75 tons
High level
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Pecari tajacu
Aburria sp.
Dasypus sp
Mazama americana
Tayassu pecari
Dasyprocta fuliginosa
Crypturellus sp.
Lagothrix lagothricha
Tapirus terrestris
Crax sp
Podocnemis unifilis
Cuniculus paca
Number of individuals
High-level waters Low-level waters
12. Species composition and quantities of bushmeat
Market places
(8)
• Mammals 74%,
birds 16%,
reptiles 10%.
• 6,7 tons in 20
days
• 3 tons Low
level
• 3,7 tons high
level
0 5 10 15 20 25
Mazama gouazoubira
Chelonoidis denticulata
Podocnemis unifilis
Tayassu pecari
Crax globulosa
Dasypus sp.
Mazama americana
Pecari tajacu
Tapirus terrestris
Cuniculus paca
Number of reports
Low level waters High level waters
13. Discussion & Conclusions
Bushmeat trade contributes to people´s livelihoods, local
economy and well-being: complete market chains
(US$686,000 year=2286 monthly min. wage=190 people)
Clandestinity provides the erronous idea that the volumes
traded are insignificant6,7 tons (8 traders/20 days)
Then bushmeat trade in Amazonian towns is not insignificant,
is instead insufficiently studied
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
Tabatinga (Brazil) -
56,21tons/52272 hab
Abaetetuba (Brazil) -
128tons/130.000hab
Franceville (Gabón)
45tons/40,000hab
kg of bushmeat/per cápita/year
14. Opportunity to legalise and regulate the market of resilient
species, while monitoring the effect of the trade on more
vulnerable ones (and regulating in accordance).
• Paca (LC): widely distributed, large population, unlikely
to be declining.
• Collared peccary: widely distributed, habitat loss and
over-hunting (LC), requires monitoring
• Tapir: VU, habitat loss, illegal hunting and competition
with livestock
• Red brocket deer: Data Deficient
Discussion & Conclusions
Innovative monitoring tools based on local
participation
15. Market data can provide valuable information for policy makers
and managers to formulate strategies for the sustainable use
of wildlife
Participatory approaches are worth trying:
• It is possible to work together with the stakeholders of the
trade chain to study the activity and put in place monitoring
mechanisms.
• Trust Cooperation
Discussion & Conclusions
Editor's Notes
To begin with, it is a reality...
The majority of studies about hunting have focused on rural contexts, it is estimated that ...are consumed in the amazon
But, little research has been made about the bushmeat trade, because the context of illegality in which it is involved, due to local environmental policies
This has led for urban bushmeat trade as insignificant also because...
However, there have been very interesting research about this issue, such as those done in...
For this reason, by developing a study case we wanted to contribute to the understanding of these questions:
So, our objective was to:
So we went to the rifrontier region between Col, Per, Bra
Mainly because there is a blend of human groups, policy and economic contexts, that were quite attractive
We identified important market centers
To answer our questions we used:
Our results
4’
We identified … in the bushmeat market chain
Where hunters were mostly men and informal restaurants were mostly run by women
Also by analizing the estructure per location we could see that there are complete market chains, with suppliers and trders at different levels
Then, based on the information we build the trifrontier bushmeat market chain, and this is how it works:
It starts with hunters ***
They sell to their communities to intermediaries or they go to market centers to sell to market traders, whom***
Also the can go directly to food…***
Finally the meat is bought by…
Now, as this is an ilegal market, surveillance affects all levels of the chain…
Actors have developed strategies to cope with controls (times of the day, cellphone, buy hunting supplies in Peru)
That can be indigenous (Colombia & Peru) and Mestizos “Caboclos” (Brazil)
We identified diversified and specialized hunters, the difference is that specialized sell 90%, have longer market networks, they have to salt or smoke the meat to conserve it because they visit mostly primary forests located at several days of distance
29%...
...they visit hunting areas by...and in they use...
Intermediaries can go to the community or wait hunters at the harbours and buy...
Whereas market traders have...
And have an average of 5 usd kg
That are located in...
We identified to type of prices, for locals and for tourists
The most preferred species were
These controls configure the types and lenght of the flows, as well as costs...
Finally, with the monitoring with hunters we registered a total of 13 tons accounting for 485 individuals where the most hunted species were ...
There was an increase of bushmeat hunted from 5,24 tons in Low level waters to 7,75 tons during high level waters
And for the case of market places, we registered 6,7 tons where SPP were the mos traded
Quantities traded were almost the same during both seasons, with 3 tons in Low level waters and 3,7 tons during high level waters
Based on this information, we can conclude that bushmeat in the region still contributes to...as this complete market chains accounts for $$$, which is equivalent to.... That can be used to sustain...
Another conclusion is that, although.... We show that bushmeat volumes traded in the trifrontier are not different from those of studies in Brazil and Central Africa, for example if we take our monitoring results from Tabatinga were 56,21 tons were traded in a population of 52272 hab, it accounts for 1kg/capita/year
That is quite similar to studies in:
Then...
We can conclude also that, as preferred species are not under endangered categories and are resilient (adapt to different habitat types and hunting pressures), there is an opportunity to...
This has to be based on innovative strategies to monitor market chains, preferences and wildlife population trends
Where the participation of local institutions and users is essential.
The aim would be to create...
…A toolkit, that can be adapted to specific contexts, as..
Finally, we showed that developing this type of research is possible even in strong contexts of illegality and surveillance, as local actors expressed their interest in this types of approaches based on…
Where the use of bushmeat can be understood as an essential livelihood for food security instead of an activity to be penalized.
Please visit our fan page in Facebook…
And the webpage of the Cifor bushmeat research initiative